Auditor-General Blasts MIIF CEO over Corrupt Audit Rewrite Requ

A brewing controversy has engulfed the Minerals Income Investment Fund (MIIF) after the Auditor-General issued a sharp, unprecedented rebuke for attempting to rewrite already audited and signed financial statements for the 2024 financial year. The development raises serious concerns about transparency, integrity, and the management of Ghana’s sovereign mineral revenues.

MIIF Ignored RTI Requests Before Seeking Audit Rewrite

The saga began in September 2025, when a former MIIF board member initiated lawful processes to obtain the Fund’s audited financial statements under the Right to Information Act. The Fund, however, refused to respond to the request.

The former board member then filed an additional request seeking proof of MIIF’s compliance with its reporting obligations under the law. MIIF again failed to respond, in what sources described as a deliberate attempt to block access to information that would contradict a narrative of mismanagement by the Fund’s previous leadership.

Faced with growing pressure and a collapsing narrative, MIIF’s CEO, Justina Nelson, allegedly pursued an extraordinary course of action: asking the Ghana Audit Service to revise the audited financial statements, even though both MIIF and the Auditor-General had formally signed them.

Audit Was Completed and Signed — Then Challenged

According to documents reviewed by this newspaper, MIIF’s audited financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2024 were:

Signed by MIIF’s Board Chairman and CEO on 26 June 2025,

Signed by the Auditor-General on 27 June 2025.

This signifies a completed audit—final, binding, and ready for statutory publication.

Despite this, on 31 October 2025, MIIF wrote to the Auditor-General requesting a “review and restatement” of the signed statements, claiming they contained “material and pervasive misstatements capable of misleading users.”

This request came after MIIF had refused to provide the statements to the former board member who had requested them.

Audit Service Rejects MIIF’s Claims, Calls Conduct “Improper”

On 7 November 2025, MIIF officials met with the Audit Service to push for a restatement. The Audit Service, however, vehemently disagreed with MIIF’s assertions and reaffirmed that the financial statements contained no material or pervasive misstatements whatsoever.

This position was formally communicated to MIIF in a letter dated 12 November 2025—received by MIIF on 13 November 2025—in which the Audit Service:

1. Declared MIIF’s claims misleading

2. ⁠Stated that the issues raised did not constitute any misstatement capable of misleading the public

3. ⁠Criticized MIIF’s language—especially the use of the word “pervasive”—as inaccurate and inappropriate, and

4. Described MIIF’s request and conduct as “improper.”

The Auditor-General firmly concluded that no part of the 2024 audited financial statements would be changed, although the Audit Service expressed willingness to work with MIIF on the 2025 statements.

MIIF Refuses Detailed Comment, Cites Confidentiality

When contacted, MIIF confirmed that the correspondence had taken place and that meetings were held with the Audit Service. However, MIIF declined to comment on the substance of the exchanges, claiming the matters were “confidential” and “ongoing.”

MIIF also confirmed that it had responded to the Audit Service’s 12 November letter, but offered no further details.

Legal Advisers Warned MIIF — But Were Ignored

Sources familiar with the matter disclosed that MIIF’s legal advisers, OSAD Legal Services, led by Dr. Eric Oduro Osae, a former Director-General of the Internal Audit Agency, repeatedly advised MIIF’s management not to pursue a restatement of signed audited accounts.

Despite this expert guidance, CEO Justina Nelson and her team allegedly pushed forward, determined to rewrite the financial record to support what insiders describe as a false narrative of mismanagement by the Fund’s previous administration.

A Question of Transparency—And the President’s Next Move

MIIF is a sovereign investment entity entrusted with managing Ghana’s mineral royalties. The law requires it to operate with the highest standards of transparency, accountability, and integrity. Yet the Fund’s leadership now stands accused of:

Blocking lawful access to information,

Seeking to alter a completed audit,

Misrepresenting financial data, and

Attempting to manipulate public perception of its predecessors.

This attempted rewrite—rebuked in strong terms by the Auditor-General—raises profound questions about the current management’s commitment to accountability.

Ghanaians, investors, and the international community will now be watching closely to see how President Mahama responds to what appears to be a coordinated, unethical effort to alter the financial history of a major sovereign fund.

Will the President defend institutional integrity, or allow MIIF’s leadership to proceed unchecked?

For now, one thing is clear: the attempt to rewrite the 2024 audited financial statements has been exposed—and forcefully rejected—by the Auditor-General.