News

Hypocrisy Unveiled in Ghana’s Parliament …Samuel Abu Jinapor’s Double Standards on Environmental Degradation

By Innocent Samuel Appiah

Member of Parliament for Damongo, Samuel Abu Jinapor, the former Minister for Lands and Natural Resources, is back in the spotlight. This time, however, it’s not for his tenure in office but rather for the glaring hypocrisy he displayed during a recent parliamentary session. Jinapor, who oversaw a period marked by rampant illegal mining activities that devastated Ghana’s water bodies and forest reserves, appears to have conveniently forgotten his role in the crisis as he now raises concerns about environmental degradation.
During his time as Minister, Jinapor was at the helm when the infamous Executive Instrument EI 144 was enacted, allowing mining activities in forest reserves. This legislation opened the floodgates for numerous mining companies to exploit Ghana’s natural resources, often without regard for environmental sustainability. The consequences have been dire: polluted rivers, deforested lands, and a deteriorating ecosystem that has alarmed environmentalists and ordinary citizens alike.
Just two months after leaving office, Jinapor found himself in Parliament criticizing the ongoing illegal mining activities, commonly referred to as “Galamsey,” that continue to plague the country. His sudden shift to a position of concern raises eyebrows and prompts questions about his integrity and accountability. How can a former minister, who was instrumental in facilitating the very policies that led to this environmental crisis, now position himself as an advocate for environmental protection?
In a recent debate, Jinapor expressed his worries over the activities of illegal miners, particularly in forest reserves, lamenting the apparent disregard for environmental laws. However, this newfound concern rings hollow, as it was under his watch that many of these destructive practices were allowed to flourish. Observers noted that his rhetoric lacked authenticity, especially since he had the power to prevent such exploitation but chose to remain silent or complicit at the time.
Critics have pointed out that this behaviour is emblematic of a broader trend among political leaders in Ghana, where accountability is often overshadowed by political expediency. Jinapor’s actions exemplify a disturbing double standard: while he now decries the environmental disasters caused by illegal mining, he was part of the government that enabled such practices to occur. This contradiction not only undermines his credibility but also raises critical questions about the moral responsibilities of public officials to the constituents they serve.
Environmental activists and concerned citizens have been vocal about the need for a lifestyle audit among former officials to understand how their decisions in power have impacted the nation. If leaders like Jinapor are allowed to escape scrutiny for their past actions while holding current office, it sets a dangerous precedent where accountability becomes optional.
Besides, Jinapor’s recent comments on the environmental crisis highlight the urgent need for a more coherent and sustainable approach to resource management in Ghana. His apparent awareness of the issues now calls into question his previous inaction and the motivations behind it. Were his decisions influenced by party loyalty or personal gain, rather than a commitment to protect Ghana’s natural resources?
In the wake of his remarks, many Ghanaians are left asking: Why should we trust a leader who once facilitated environmental destruction to now champion its protection? Jinapor’s actions reflect a troubling pattern of behaviour among public officials who prioritize political survival over genuine accountability and environmental stewardship.
As the nation grapples with the consequences of illegal mining, it is essential for leaders to face the realities of their past decisions. The public deserves leaders who embody integrity and transparency, not those who flip-flop on critical issues for political gain.
In conclusion, Samuel Abu Jinapor’s recent criticisms of environmental degradation, while valid, are overshadowed by his previous actions as Minister for Lands and Natural Resources. His hypocrisy serves as a reminder that accountability must extend beyond mere words in Parliament; it requires a genuine commitment to rectify past mistakes and ensure a sustainable future for Ghana’s environment. The time has come for all leaders to stop the double standards and take responsibility for their actions—both past and present. Only then can Ghana hope to rebuild its natural resources and create a healthier environment for future generations.

Related Articles

Back to top button