“I Will Sue Ofori-Atta’s Corpse If He Fails to Return Alive to Answer Questions” – Solomon Owusu
Story: Maurice Otoo
The Director of Communication for the United Party, Solomon Owusu, has issued a strongly worded warning to former Finance Minister Ken Ofori-Atta, urging him to return to Ghana to address accountability concerns following reports of his alleged encounter with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
Speaking during a studio discussion on Kessben Maakye, Owusu questioned the circumstances surrounding Ofori-Atta’s stay in the United States. He challenged earlier claims that the former minister had travelled abroad for medical treatment, insisting that recent developments paint a different picture.
According to Owusu, reports that Ofori-Atta was picked up by ICE while “chilling in America” raise serious questions about his intentions and credibility.
“If Ofori-Atta has nothing to hide, why is he running away from accountability?” Owusu asked.
He stressed that Ghanaians deserve answers on issues surrounding Ofori-Atta’s tenure in office, adding that returning to face scrutiny is the only way to clear any doubts.
In remarks that have since sparked widespread debate, Owusu warned that he would not relent in seeking accountability under any circumstances.
“I will sue Ofori-Atta’s corpse if he fails to come and answer questions alive,” he declared. “Everybody will one day die, but Ghana does not deserve dead bodies. He must return and answer questions before he dies, otherwise I will take legal action and ensure his body is not brought back to Ghana.”
The comments have generated mixed reactions among the public, with some describing the language as extreme, while others argue it reflects growing frustration over perceived impunity among public officials.
As of the time of filing this report, there has been no official response from Ken Ofori-Atta or his representatives regarding the ICE-related claims or Owusu’s statements.
Observers say the controversy underscores increasing calls for transparency and accountability in public office, as the debate continues to unfold.
