A psychologist, Prof. Emmanuel Asampong, has questioned the basis for proposals seeking to impose an age ceiling on Members of Parliament (MPs), arguing that age alone is not a reliable measure of an individual’s capacity to serve effectively.
Speaking on the matter via zoom interview on Kessben TV’s Digest, Prof. Asampong challenged the conventional understanding of age, asking whether it should be defined in biological, physical, or mental terms.
According to him, attempts to link age directly to performance, particularly in relation to stress management among MPs, are not scientifically grounded.
He maintained that while ageing may come with certain physical limitations, it also brings valuable qualities such as experience and maturity, which are essential in legislative work. “Age contributes to experience and maturity.
Though ageing may come with some weaknesses, that alone cannot be used as a yardstick to deny individuals the opportunity to serve in Parliament,” he stated.
Prof. Asampong further emphasized that the selection of MPs is ultimately the responsibility of constituents, not determined by proposals from just two lawmakers. He stressed that understanding parliamentary procedures and having the competence to represent the people should be the primary considerations.
Instead of focusing on an upper age limit, the psychologist suggested that attention be directed toward the minimum age requirement for parliamentary candidates. He argued that scientific research indicates that significant attitude formation begins around the age of 21, making it a more relevant benchmark for eligibility.
His comments add to the ongoing national conversation on Honourable Ohene Kwame Frimpong, MP Asante Akyem South and Ibrahimah Zuwera, MP Salaga’s proposed criteria for parliamentary representation.
