CrimeNews

Agradaa Case: Court directs parties to submit plea bargain details

The High Court in Accra has directed the parties in the case involving Patricia Asieduaa popularly known as Nana Agradaa and her co-accused to file the terms of a proposed plea bargain ahead of the next sitting.

The High Court in Accra has directed the parties in the case involving Patricia Asieduaa popularly known as Nana Agradaa and her co-accused to file the terms of a proposed plea bargain ahead of the next sitting.

The Court ordered that the agreement be filed at least three clear days before the adjourned date of December 16, 2025.

During proceedings on Tuesday, December 2, prosecutors indicated they were considering applying for a bench warrant for the second accused. However, defence counsel explained that they had not been served with the hearing notice.

Counsel for Nana Agradaa informed the Court that discussions with the Office of the Attorney-General on a potential plea bargain were “far advanced” and requested a short adjournment. The prosecutor confirmed that the complainant, Emmanuel Appiah Fumum, had been involved in the ongoing discussions and was present in court.

The Judge subsequently instructed the Registry to ensure that a hearing notice is properly served on counsel for the second accused before the next court date.

The case arises from allegations that Nana Agradaa, a former fetish priestess turned evangelist, broadcast nude images of Pastor Emmanuel Appiah Fumum (popularly known as Osofo Biblical) on her TV station and social media platforms without his consent.

According to prosecutors, the images were shown during a live programme in which panelists mocked the complainant, contrary to provisions of the Cybersecurity Act, 2020 (Act 1038), which prohibits the non-consensual sharing of intimate images.

Nana Agradaa—who is currently serving a 15-year jail term in a separate case for defrauding by false pretence—was present in court.

Lawyers for Nana Agradaa raised concerns about recent media interviews granted by the complainant, in which he allegedly claimed that their client had been in a poor state since her incarceration.

The presiding judge, however, urged the prosecution to educate the complainant on refraining from such public comments.

CitiNewsRoom

Related Articles

Back to top button