Why Members of Parliament of the New Patriotic Party Should Support Strong Leadership to Win Back Their Seats While in Opposition

The New Patriotic Party (NPP) currently finds itself in opposition, a position that demands reflection, renewal, and strategic action. After losing power, many of its Members of Parliament (MPs) either lost their seats or now face uncertain political futures. For these individuals, the path back to political relevance and electoral victory depends on strong leadership, renewed public trust, and alignment with individuals who represent integrity, courage, and grassroots strength. One such individual is Hon. Kennedy Ohene Agyapong, the MP for Assin Central, a well-known figure not only within the NPP but across the broader Ghanaian political landscape. His years of experience, unwavering commitment to the people, fearless advocacy, and results-oriented politics make him an indispensable figure as the NPP seeks to reposition itself and regain lost parliamentary seats. It is essential for NPP MPs to recognise the strategic importance of supporting Hon. Kennedy Agyapong, not just for his personal political stature, but because his unique qualities and proven record can help them reconnect with voters, revive hope, and ultimately reclaim their seats.
Hon. Kennedy Agyapong has consistently distinguished himself as a leader who does not retreat in the face of political adversity. While many politicians become invisible when their party loses power, Agyapong’s influence and public engagement grow stronger. He thrives in opposition because he is rooted in the people, not dependent on executive positions or state resources to remain relevant. His unwavering loyalty to the NPP, even when he disagrees with certain decisions, has solidified his image as a man who prioritises principle over personal gain. This rare political posture makes him a beacon for NPP MPs who must now fight to win back public trust while their party is no longer in government.
One of Agyapong’s most notable strengths lies in his direct relationship with the grassroots. Unlike many politicians who interact with constituents only during campaign seasons, Kennedy Agyapong has maintained consistent contact with the people, listening to their needs and investing his personal resources to address them. He has built schools, supported youth training programs, provided scholarships, and contributed to local development projects, even without holding ministerial office. This track record resonates deeply with the electorate, particularly in a political environment where voters are increasingly frustrated with leaders who make promises but deliver little. MPs who were voted out due to perceived neglect of their constituencies can benefit greatly from aligning with Agyapong’s people-first model. By supporting a leader who leads by example, they can begin to rebuild credibility with their constituents.
Furthermore, Kennedy Agyapong’s financial independence and business acumen have afforded him the rare ability to speak freely and act without fear or favour. He does not rely on state contracts or political favours to maintain his influence. Instead, he has built a vast business empire and uses his resources to uplift others and fund political activities. In opposition, where resources are scarce and campaign logistics become challenging, MPs can benefit from the support of someone who is both capable and willing to assist. Agyapong has, over the years, offered financial support to party members and helped fund various campaigns across the country. His generosity and loyalty to the party’s cause remain unquestionable. Supporting him opens the door for collaboration, knowledge-sharing, and practical assistance that can help MPs mount effective campaigns and reconnect with their base.
In addition to his philanthropy, Agyapong’s credibility as a truth-teller and advocate for accountability makes him a powerful voice in opposition. Ghanaians are disillusioned with political rhetoric that lacks substance, and Kennedy Agyapong’s straightforward approach to issues cuts through the noise. He is unafraid to speak out against corruption, inefficiency, or injustice, even when it involves members of his own party. This fearless honesty appeals to a broad segment of the population, including independent voters and younger Ghanaians who are seeking authenticity in politics. For NPP MPs hoping to regain the trust of their constituents, associating with Agyapong presents an opportunity to adopt a similar posture of accountability and transparency.
Moreover, Agyapong’s commitment to youth empowerment makes him particularly relevant at a time when Ghana’s youth population is both politically active and economically frustrated. His numerous investments in education, skills training, and job creation reflect a deep understanding of the challenges facing young people. In many constituencies, MPs lost their seats because they failed to address youth unemployment and failed to engage young people meaningfully. Supporting Agyapong allows MPs to draw from his example, prioritise youth-centred initiatives, and align themselves with a figure who speaks the language of opportunity and empowerment. This shift in focus could be key in regaining the confidence of young voters who may have become disenchanted with politics.
In opposition, controlling the narrative becomes crucial, and Kennedy Agyapong has mastered the art of political communication. His dominance in the media landscape and his ability to command national attention through interviews, public speeches, and televised programs make him a formidable force. He owns media platforms and has used them to defend the party, criticise its shortcomings, and promote national dialogue. MPs who support him gain access to this powerful communication ecosystem. More importantly, they align themselves with a leader who understands the pulse of the public and is capable of shaping public opinion. As they prepare to return to the campaign trail, these MPs can benefit from Agyapong’s influence in the media and his ability to advocate effectively for party unity and reform.
Agyapong is also widely seen as a bridge between the various factions within the NPP. In opposition, internal unity is critical to any party’s ability to win power again. Factionalism, if left unchecked, can cost the party more seats and alienate voters who are tired of infighting. Despite his fiery personality, Agyapong has often acted as a unifier, calling for fairness in internal processes and defending the interests of ordinary party members. MPs who have found themselves sidelined by internal party politics may find in Agyapong an ally who believes in merit, fairness, and loyalty to the party’s founding principles. Supporting him could open up new opportunities for reconciliation and collaboration within the party, ultimately creating a stronger front for the 2028 general elections.
It is also worth emphasising that Kennedy Agyapong’s national appeal cuts across tribal, regional, and religious lines. Although he hails from the Central Region, he is respected across the Ashanti Region, Eastern Region, Greater Accra, and parts of the Northern regions. His ability to resonate with diverse demographics makes him an important figure in building a national coalition. MPs from all regions can benefit from his wide acceptance and use that to build bridges within their own constituencies.
In conclusion, the opposition phase is often the most difficult yet most crucial period in a political party’s journey. For NPP MPs who lost their seats or now face stronger opposition challenges, aligning with Hon. Kennedy Ohene Agyapong offers a strategic advantage grounded in credibility, service, resilience, and vision. He embodies the kind of leadership that thrives under pressure and inspires loyalty at the grassroots level. By supporting him, NPP MPs do not just endorse a man, 0
they adopt a mindset of service, boldness, and connection with the people. In the challenging years ahead, this alignment may be the key to not only winning back parliamentary seats but also restoring the soul of the party itself.
BY SAMPSON ATTAH – UK BUSINESS STUDIES LECTURER