“Return my virginity and my standing breasts if you want us to divorce” – Wife tells husband in court

A 28-year-old teacher, Suliat, has demanded that her husband, Lateef, return her virginity and physical health before she will consent to their divorce. The unusual request was made during proceedings at the Iseyin Grade C Customary Court, where Lateef sought the dissolution of their two-year marriage, citing frequent public embarrassment caused by Suliat’s confrontations with him in public spaces.

Suliat’s response to her husband’s divorce petition was both unexpected and dramatic. She accused Lateef of using charms to manipulate her into marriage. According to her, she had sought spiritual assistance from him to boost her business. In exchange, Lateef allegedly asked for some of her pubic hair and intimate relations. Suliat claims that after complying with his requests, her business flourished, and she found herself married to him.

However, she now alleges that her health has deteriorated since their union, and she demands that her virginity and health be restored before she will agree to the divorce. This condition has turned the divorce proceedings into a complex and highly publicised case.

The court, presided over by Chief Raheem Adelodun, has adjourned the case until Suliat’s health improves. The judge ordered both families to seek urgent medical attention for Suliat and to provide updates to the court every 15 days. This decision underscores the gravity of the situation and the court’s commitment to ensuring the well-being of the parties involved.

The case has sparked widespread discussion, with many questioning the feasibility of Suliat’s demands. Legal experts and the public alike are debating the implications of her request and the court’s role in addressing such personal and complex issues. While some view her condition as a form of emotional distress, others are concerned about the legal precedents this case may set.

The demand for the return of virginity and physical health in divorce proceedings presents a unique legal and ethical dilemma. The ongoing case serves as a poignant reminder of the complexities involved in personal relationships and the legal system’s role in addressing them.