We’re not responsible for payment delays – Zoomlion tells YEA operatives
Management of Zoomlion Ghana Limited has clarified that the company is not responsible for the delayed payments to operatives under the Youth Employment Agency’s (YEA) Sanitation Module.
Recent reports suggested that Zoomlion was behind the delays in allowances for YEA operatives in certain parts of the country.
However, in a statement released on Thursday, October 3, 2024, Zoomlion explained that the delays are due to the government’s failure to disburse the necessary funds, which is beyond their control.
Zoomlion further clarified that the payment of YEA operatives’ allowances is managed entirely by the government and YEA.
Once the funds are released to Zoomlion, the company processes the payments to the beneficiaries. Despite overseeing the daily activities of YEA operatives, Zoomlion emphasized that it has no authority over the amount or timing of the payments.
This clarification comes in the wake of previous controversies involving Zoomlion’s services, including allegations that the company was pocketing GH¢400 from each beneficiary’s GH¢500 monthly allowance.
Zoomlion has denied these claims, explaining that the GH¢400 management fee is used to cover logistics costs, such as the procurement of wheelbarrows, shovels, and brooms for the operatives.
“Clarification on Delayed Payments: We understand the concerns about delays in the payment of allowances in some regions. However, Zoomlion is not responsible for these delays, as the government has not yet disbursed funds to the company for payment.”
Zoomlion Ghana Limited reaffirmed its dedication to supporting operatives within the established framework, ensuring timely facilitation of payments once government funds are disbursed.
“We wish to assure all YEA operatives and the public that Zoomlion remains committed to supporting the operatives within the agreed framework and will continue to work closely with the government to ensure timely payments when funds are made available.”
Zoomlion appeals to affected beneficiaries to address grievances through amicable and constructive engagement, avoiding harmful statements or actions that may unjustly tarnish its image.
“We firmly believe that it is in the best interest of and fairness to all parties involved to engage in open and constructive dialogue rather than resorting to actions and pronouncements that may tarnish the image of the company.”
Source: Citinewsroom
